Baywood Publishing Company
1055-7512
1541-3799
Journal of Individual Employment Rights
BWIE
300324
http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=300324
5
2
2
0
0
0
000005000219960101
Number 2 / 1996-97
PHMQDDB915Q5
http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&id=PHMQDDB915Q5
10.2190/C7YD-2M04-L6N1-L1QC
C7YD2M04L6N1L1QC
3
Predictors of the Implementation of Employee Drug Testing
125
135
20020509
20020509
20020509
20020509
C7YD2M04L6N1L1QC.pdf
http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=C7YD2M04L6N1L1QC
2
Bruce
J.
Eberhardt
Steven
B.
Moser
Laura
Driscoll
University of North Dakota, Grand Forks
This study investigated four categories of predictors of the use of the employee drug testing. The categories included company revenue, type of company, unionization, and attitudinal measures collected from human resource managers. Data were collected from 101 small-to-moderate-sized companies, of which 35 percent engaged in drug testing. Factor analysis was conducted on an attitudinal scale that asked respondents to indicate the appropriateness of drug testing in thirty-four occupations. Two factors were revealed: one concerned occupations in which drug testing may be considered discretionary, while the second concerned occupations that require drug testing for safety reasons. Stepwise regression analysis revealed significant effects for the attitudinal and type-of-company measures. Manufacturing/transportation firms and managers who were in favor of drug testing for discretionary occupations were more likely to test. Explanations of the results are discussed along with implications for the implementation of drug testing.