Arch Fam Med
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 11, November 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  •  Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Primary Care and the Human Genome Project

Into the Breach

David J. Doukas, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(11):1179-1183.

Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.

1. Nolan K, Swenson S. New tools, new dilemmas: genetic frontiers. Hastings Cent Rep. 1988;18(5):40-46. PUBMED
2. Murray TH. The Human Genome Project and genetic testing: ethical implications. In: The Genome, Ethics and the Law: Issues in Genetic Testing. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 1991:49-78.
3. Powledge T. Ethical and legal implications of genetic testing: a synthesis. In: The Genome, Ethics and the Law: Issues in Genetic Testing. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 1991:1-21.
4. Botkin JR. Prenatal screening: professional standard and the limits of parental choice. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:875-880. PUBMED
5. Davis JG. Genetic disease, government, and social justice. In: Milunsky A, Annas G, eds. Genetics and the Law III. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1985:385-393.
6. Elsas L. A clinical approach to legal and ethical problems in human genetics. Emory Law J. 1990;39(3):814-824.
7. Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC. Genetic counseling: parents' responses to uncertainty. Birth Defects. 1979;15:325-339. PUBMED
8. Walters L. Genetics and reproductive technologies. In: Veatch R, ed. Medical Ethics. Boston, Mass: Jones & Bartlett; 1989:201-228.
9. Collins F. Medical and ethical consequences of the Human Genome Project. J Clin Ethics. 1991;2:260-267. PUBMED
10. Brody H. Ethics, technology, and the Human Genome Project. J Clin Ethics. 1991;2:278-281. PUBMED
11. Doukas D. Genetics research and social roles: on a collision course? J Clin Ethics. 1991;2:258-259. PUBMED
12. Quaid KA, Brandt J, Faden RR, Folstein SE. Knowledge, attitude, and the decision to be tested for Huntington's disease. Clin Genet. 1989;36:431-438. PUBMED
13. Wiggins S, Whyte MA, Huggins M, et al. The psychological consequences of predictive testing for Huntington's disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1401-1405. ABSTRACT
14. Doukas D. Autonomy and beneficence in the family: describing the family covenant. J Clin Ethics. 1991;2:145-148. PUBMED
15. Hays CV. Genetic disease for Huntington's disease: a family issue. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1449-1451. PUBMED
16. Singer E. Public attitudes toward genetic testing. Popul Res Policy Rev. 1991;10:235-255. PUBMED
17. Bazelon DL. Governing technology: values, choices, and scientific progress. In: Iannone AP, ed. Contemporary Moral Controversies in Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1987: 132-140.
18. Byk C. The Human Genome Project and the social contract: a law policy approach. J Med Philos. 1992:17:371-380. FREE FULL TEXT
19. Holtzman NA. Public participation in genetic policymaking. In: Milunsky A. Annas G. eds. Genetics and the Law II. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1980:247-255.
20. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Splicing Life: The Social and Ethical Issues of Genetics Engineering With Human Beings. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1982.
21. Fishkin J. The Dialogue of Justice: Toward a Self-Reflective Society. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1992.
22. Fleck LM. Just health care rationing: a democratic decisionmaking approach. Univ Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1992:140:1636.
23. Jennings B. A grassroots movement in bioethics: community health decisions. Hastings Cent Rep. 1988;18(special suppl):1-16. PUBMED