JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 11, November 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Excerpt
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Cervical Cancer Screening-Reply

Mack T. Ruffin, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(11):1114-1115.


References
Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.


1. Ruffin MT. Cervical cancer screening: issues of collection tools and reporting. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:261-263. FREE FULL TEXT
2. McCord ML, Stovall TG, Meric JL, Summit RL, Coleman SA. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1772-1779. PUBMED
3. Hutchinson M, Fertitta I, Goldbaum B, Hamza M, Vanerian F, Isenstein L. Cervix-Brush and cytobrush: a comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears. J Reprod Med. 1991;36:581-586. PUBMED
4. Ferris DG, Berrey MN, Ellis KE, Petry LJ, Voxnaes J, Beatie RT. The optimal technique for obtaining a Papanicolaou smear with a Cervix-Brush. J Fam Pract. 1992;34:276-280. PUBMED
5. Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Rietveld-Scheffers PE. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology: improvements in smear quality and detection rates. Acta Cytol. 1986;30:264-270. PUBMED
6. Boon ME, de Graff-Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears. Acta Cytol. 1988;33:843-848.
7. Davey DD, Nielsen ML, Rosenstock W, Kline TS. Terminology and specimen adequacy in cervicovaginal cytology: the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116:903-907. PUBMED
8. Selvaggi SM. Spatula/cytobrush vs spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions. J Reprod Med. 1989;34:629-633. PUBMED
9. Gupta JW, Gupta PK, Rosenshein N, Shah KV. Detection of human papillomavirus in cervical smears: a comparison of in situ hybridization, immunocytochemistry and cytopathology. Acta Cytol. 1987;31:387-396. PUBMED
10. Boras VF, Duggan MA. Cervical dyskeratotic cells as predictors of condylomatous changes on biopsy. Acta Cytol. 1989;33:223-227. PUBMED
11. Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Hoover RN, et al. Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:958-964. FREE FULL TEXT
12. Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Boon ME. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears. Acta Cytol. 1988;32:801-804. PUBMED
13. Gottlieb SS. The use of antiarrhythmic agents in heart failure: implications of CAST. Am Heart J. 1989;118:1074-1077. PUBMED
14. Reiffel JA, Cook JT. Physician attitudes toward the use of type IC antiarrhythmics after the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:1262-1264. PUBMED
15. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) investigators. Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:406-412. ABSTRACT
16. Ruskin JN. The cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST). N Engl J Med. 1989;321:386-388. PUBMED