JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 7, July 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Foot Morphologic Characteristics and Risk of Exercise-Relatedn Injury

David N. Cowan, PhD; Bruce H. Jones, MD, MPH; John R. Robinson, MS

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(7):773-777.


Abstract

Objective
It is widely accepted that persons with flat or high-arched feet are at increased risk of exercise-associated injury, even though this purported association has not been scientifically evaluated. We evaluate the risk of exercise-associated injury among young men with flat, normal, and high-arched feet.

Design
A prospective study of 246 US Army Infantry trainees followed up over a rigorous 12-week training Program. All subjects were evaluated prior to onset of training. Evaluation included photographs of the right, weightbearing foot that were digitized and utilized to make several measures of arch height.

Setting
An army initial entry training center.

Subjects
All trainees beginning army training on 2 successive weeks were potential volunteers. There were no criteria for exclusion other than declining to participate (n=3). The subjects were healthy, active young men with a mean age of 20.3 years.

Outcome Measure
The occurrence of a lower-extremity musculoskeletal injury resulting in a visit to and a diagnosis by an army physician or physician assistant. Treating physicians and physician assistants were blind to participation status and were not study staff members.

Results
On univariate analysis, there was an association between arch height and risk of injury using several alternative operational definitions of foot type. The 20% with the flattest feet were at the lowest risk (reference group; odds ratio, 1.0), with adjusted odds ratios for any musculoskeletal injury of 3.0 (P<.05) for the middle 60% group and 6.1 (P<.05) for the highest 20% group.

Conclusions
These findings do not support the hypothesis that low-arched individuals are at increased risk of injury, and they have implications for runners, exercise enthusiasts, and clinicians. It may be possible to prevent substantial morbidity among active populations by identifying individuals at high risk and advising alternate activities.



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC (Dr Cowan); the Division of Occupational Medicine, Army Research Institute for Environmental Medicine, Natick, Mass (Dr Jones); and the Department of Scientific Research, Nike Inc, Beaverton, Ore (Mr Robinson).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect of Running Shoe Type on the Distribution and Magnitude of Plantar Pressures in Individuals with Low- or High-Arched Feet
Molloy et al.
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2009;99:330-338.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Flat-Footedness Is Not a Disadvantage for Athletic Performance in Children Aged 11 to 15 Years
Tudor et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:e386-e392.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Arch Height Index Measurement System: Establishment of Reliability and Normative Values
Butler et al.
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2008;98:102-106.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association between foot type and tibial stress injuries: a systematic review
Barnes et al.
Br. J. Sports. Med. 2008;42:93-98.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of plantar contact area to predict medial longitudinal arch height during walking.
McPoil and Cornwall
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2006;96:489-494.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Foot Type and Overuse Injury in Triathletes
Burns et al.
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2005;95:235-241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differences in sole arch indices in various sports
Aydog et al.
Br. J. Sports. Med. 2005;39:e5-e5.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Examining the Validity of Selected Measures of Foot Type: A Preliminary Study
Mathieson et al.
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2004;94:275-281.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature
Murphy et al.
Br. J. Sports. Med. 2003;37:13-29.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Four Methods of Obtaining a Negative Impression of the Foot
Laughton et al.
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2002;92:261-268.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measurements Used to Characterize the Foot and the Medial Longitudinal Arch: Reliability and Validity
Williams and McClay
ptjournal 2000;80:864-871.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Foot Structure and Range of Motion on Musculoskeletal Overuse Injuries
Kaufman et al.
Am J Sports Med 1999;27:585-593.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

It's OK to Be Flat-Footed
Journal Watch Dermatology 1993;1993:14-14.
FULL TEXT  

IT'S OK TO BE FLAT-FOOTED
JWatch General 1993;1993:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

Flatfeet Become Respectable
Fields
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:723-724.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.